July 2008


Looking back six decades, what I’ve seen.

The often sporadic and shaky transition of a society as perhaps most societies must change during an individual’s lifetime.

I was born into cultural conformity, matured into social upheaval, and lived mainly in a world of backsliding content and indifference.

Last night I watched a John F. Kennedy speech in which he announced America’s intention to land a man on the moon before the end of decade.

Kennedy justified the entire Apollo venture in a line often forgotten about how it was important, in the development of mankind, that free men fully participate in any advances. He was trying to say that, once we fell technologically behind, we risked our very freedom.

But can we retain that edge, upon which our very freedom relies, with an unaware, apathetic society?

To me, it’s a “net sum” game. We become ever more physically capable and sophisticated at every conceivable level of human communication – but at the price of being ever less perceptive, unchallenged, untested and, ultimately, smaller human beings.

I guess that explains why I’m at times so pessimistic about the future. The challenges today are looming larger than ever in centuries, possibly millenia, and yet they’re arriving at a time when we’ve allowed ourselves to become “smaller”, less adaptable, less self-reliant, less courageous than we’ve been and had to be in earlier generations.

From global warming and associated climate change to nuclear proliferation and global insecurity to resource exhaustion, species extinction and overpopulation, we’ll soon be confronted by the full effects of our excess and apathy. Will the “free men” of Kennedy’s vision be up to the challenge? Do we still have what it takes to preserve our freedom in this changing world or have we simply grown too small?

A secret World Bank report obtained by The Guardian concludes that biofuel production is responsible for a 75% increase in global food prices.

“The damning unpublished assessment is based on the most detailed analysis of the crisis so far, carried out by an internationally-respected economist at global financial body.

The figure emphatically contradicts the US government’s claims that plant-derived fuels contribute less than 3% to food-price rises. It will add to pressure on governments in Washington and across Europe, which have turned to plant-derived fuels to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and reduce their dependence on imported oil.
Senior development sources believe the report, completed in April, has not been published to avoid embarrassing President George Bush.
“It would put the World Bank in a political hot-spot with the White House,” said one yesterday.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/jul/03/biofuels.renewableenergy

« Previous Page

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started