November 2007
November 29, 2007
November 29, 2007
How The Other "Earth" Went Astray
Posted by MoS under environment, greenhouse gases, VenusLeave a Comment
“Earth and Venus were pretty much identical to start with … It really made you think the physics was different, which obviously it couldn’t be,” said Prof Fredric Taylor at Oxford University. Some scientists had thought that Venus’s proximity to the sun was key to its transformation, but the new data suggests a different explanation: “It’s not evil, just unfortunate.” Venus Express’s data appear in a set of paper’s in today’s edition of Nature.
November 29, 2007
Big Business (British) Goes Green
Posted by MoS under Britain, carbon emissions, global warmingLeave a Comment
Some of Britain’s biggest companies – car makers, airlines, banks and retailers – have joined together, pledging to offer greener products and pursue research into ways to reduce carbon emissions.
The group, which includes British Petroleum, Tesco and British Telephone, intend to set the standard for regular monitoring and reporting of carbon emissions, investing in technology and emission reducing products and promoting greener behaviour by their employees.
The 18-companies involved employ more than two million people worldwide and generate revenues of two trillion dollars annually. The group is to release a report on Monday setting out its plans. It notes that the real responsibility for cutting emissions lies with consumers who, through their purchases, directly influence some 60% of Britain’s carbon emissions.
November 29, 2007
Decisions, decisions. What’s a president to do? According to CNN, these are some of the decisions beguiling the president:
“…how to get the Saudis more involved in solving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, how to get them more engaged against terrorism, how to address the Arab view that the United States always sides with Israel and how to build up moderate Palestinians to counter extremists.”
The president, however, wasn’t George w. Bush, but Richard m. Nixon.
Declassified documents just released by the Nixon library show Tricky Dick was dealing with almost the same issues that confront Bush three decades later. And, yes, Nixon was just as successful in dealing with them as Bush has been.
November 28, 2007
November 28, 2007
It sounds as though Conrad Black has some hope of getting off lightly when he comes up before a Chicago judge for sentencing next month.
Right now the consensus is that Black can expect to get something in the range of 5 to 7-years if the judge accepts the findings of a court-ordered report. The pre-sentencing report disputes some of the claims the prosecution is making in seeing a 20-year term for Black.
The report concludes the amount actually lost was about $6-million, not the $32-million alleged by prosecutors, notes that the crime was not a “sophisticated” as in meticulously planned fraud, and that most of the misconduct happened outside the U.S.
The National Post reveals how overzealous Black’s prosecutors can be. They’re asking that “the relevant-conduct analysis should consider not only convicted conduct, but also acquitted and uncharged criminal conduct that is proved by a preponderance of evidence.” Say what? They want the judge to assess Black’s sentence by incorporating conduct for which he’s either not been charged or has been acquitted? I don’t much care for Connie but this is really piling on
Wonder what Babs is going to do. Will she dump Connie and go for a new suitor or will she hang around and wait for her Lordship to come back to her open arms?
November 28, 2007
By most accounts, conditions on the ground in Iraq, particularly in Baghdad, have improved noticeably over the past two months. There’s disagreement on why but the improvement is pretty well accepted.
The outlook on the war among the American people has certainly picked up. A Pew Research poll found that 48% now believe the war is going fairly well compared to just 30% last February. Yet this growing confidence hasn’t translated into improved support for either the war or for George w. Bush.
The percentage of Americans who want their troops out soon has held at 54% compared to 53% last February. It was telling that the percentage of Americans who still believe the Iraq war will wind up poorly hasn’t changed at all. The latest figures from Pew shows Bush’s approval rating has actually fallen a few points to 30%. Probably the economy and subprime mortgage meltdown have offset any extra support Bush might have hoped for from Iraq.
The numbers seem to suggest that a lot of Americans made their minds up about this war some time ago and improvements now are too little, too late to change their minds.
November 28, 2007
It’s reported that the Commons Ethics Committee will have government lawyers open the questioning of Karlheinz Schreiber when and if he appears before them tomorrow.
If it was up to me, my first question would be to ask Schreiber if he would release his former lawyer, Robert Hladun, from his privilege restrictions concerning any communications between Hladun, Brian Mulroney and Mulroney’s lawyer, Gerard Tremblay, during October, 1999, pertaining to funds that passed from Schreiber to Mulroney or Frank Moores.
Why focus on this? The answer is contained in this account from the Fifth Estate of events said to have transpired on October 17, 1999:
October 17, 1999
“Mulroney contacts Schreiber’s lawyer Robert Hladun and asks him to ask Schreiber for a written statement indicating that at no time did Mulroney solicit or receive compensation from Karlheinz Schreiber.
Gerard Tremblay phones Robert Hladun and asks for a letter to keep on file from Schreiber, which is not to be disseminated, so that he can send a letter to the CBC which “would in his opinion shut down the airing of the fifth estate story on the “Airbus”—October 20th.
Mulroney contacts Hladun and tells him he has instructed Tremblay to send a letter to the fifth estate “indicating that if there was the slightest implication that Mr. Schreiber, Mr. Moores and Brian Mulroney were involved in any way then there would be terrible consequences.
He would issue the letter but first wanted an assurance or comfort in writing from Mr. Schreiber saying that he would confirm what he had publicly on many occasions, that at no time did Brian Mulroney solicit or receive of any kind from Schreiber. Mulroney called Hladun again that day, at which time Mulroney was told “I was no sure whether or not a letter would be forthcoming.”
These events, to my mind, could be the most troublesome for Mulroney because of what they say if they’re true and because they can be confirmed or denied by a person whose integrity is not questioned, Robert Hladun.
If Hladun corroborates this account it would put Mulroney in the spot of having to explain why he personally contacted Schreiber’s lawyer asking for a letter from Schreiber denying payments that even Mulroney himself now acknowledges he received. It would also make it vastly more difficult for Mulroney to lay on the blarney about what he said under oath in his lawsuit and why he forgot to declare this income for tax purposes until it was disclosed in the media. In other words, any guy who would try to pull this stunt has just kissed goodbye the benefit of the doubt.
If these events didn’t happen I think Hladun would be eager to set the record straight, if only to extricate himself from the controversy.
November 28, 2007
November 28, 2007





